Which assumption about a CSP should be avoided when considering risks in a disaster recovery (DR) plan?

In the context of evaluating risks in a disaster recovery plan for a Cloud Service Provider (CSP), the assumption regarding the level of resiliency should be avoided because it can lead to overconfidence in the provider's ability to withstand and recover from adverse events. The level of resiliency includes factors such as the CSP's ability to implement redundancies, handle outages, and maintain service continuity.

Assuming that a CSP inherently has a high level of resiliency without verifying their specific capabilities or historical performance can create a blind spot in the risk assessment process. Each CSP operates differently, and their systems, processes, and infrastructures can vary significantly. It is essential to conduct thorough due diligence, including reviewing service level agreements (SLAs) and testing the disaster recovery plans to understand their actual resiliency.

In contrast, other assumptions such as continuity planning typically refer to well-established frameworks and practices that should be in place by the CSP. Likewise, assuming costs will remain the same can often be misleading, but it can be more manageable than blindly trusting resilience capabilities. Lastly, evaluating a provider's history provides insights into their performance track record, which can confirm or challenge assumptions about their resiliency. Hence, focusing on the level of resiliency without proper investigation can significantly undermine